O representante das massas
O Luís Marvão apresenta, abaixo, o novo presidente da Bolívia como um (um dos) messias que irá libertar a América Latina do "despotismo liberal".
Presumo que para o Marvão tenha sido esse despotismo que levou a região ao estado em que hoje se encontra. Proponho-lhe a leitura deste artigo de Alvaro Vargas Llosa (já sei - é um perigoso liberal...):
Presumo que para o Marvão tenha sido esse despotismo que levou a região ao estado em que hoje se encontra. Proponho-lhe a leitura deste artigo de Alvaro Vargas Llosa (já sei - é um perigoso liberal...):
One only needs to look at Morales' own life story to realize his own deprivation, like that of so many other Aymara Indians, was the result of nationalism, populism, and socialism, and not, as he maintains, of globalization. Why did he become a coca grower in the 1980s? He was born in Isallavi, in the tin-mining region of Oruro, at a time when tin mines lay in ruins. The reason for their decline was the 1952 revolution, which "nationalized" them and created a bureaucratic mining entity known by its acronym COMIBOL. The revolution raised miners' salaries by 50 percent but failed to keep up investments, so production collapsed. Eventually, thousands of families, among them the Morales family, had to move elsewhere.(...)
He went to the Yungas, near La Paz, to try agriculture. What did he find? In 1953, the revolutionary government had undertaken land reform, expropriating those estates it deemed unproductive and handing them to some peasant associations. Restrictions on property rights were so abundant and legal frameworks so dodgy that a few years later Bolivia had to import food because its unproductive minifundia were useless.(...)
Where did young Evo go after Yungas? To the rainforests of Chapare, this offered the only opportunity available to him. That opportunity was coca -- coca not exactly geared towards the production of shampoo, toothpaste, and medicines. In Chapare, the new coca grower rose through the ranks of unionism, until he emerged in 2000 as a voice against foreign capital and the insufficient free-market reforms of the 1990s, which he blamed for social ills that were the result of five decades of nationalism and socialism's ill-fated attempt to correct the oligarchic legacy of the colonial era.